Re: Re: [Pg-migrator-general] Composite types break pg_migrated tables - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Re: [Pg-migrator-general] Composite types break pg_migrated tables
Date
Msg-id 4245.1249517125@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Re: [Pg-migrator-general] Composite types break pg_migrated tables  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: Re: [Pg-migrator-general] Composite types break pg_migrated tables  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Hm ... has anyone tested pg_migrator using either composite types or
>> arrays of user-defined types?  Both of them have got user-defined-type
>> OIDs in on-disk data, now that I think about it.  For that matter, enums
>> are going to be a problem too.

> Don't arrays have embedded element OIDs too?

Er, that's what I said.  It looks nasty :-(
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: [Pg-migrator-general] Composite types break pg_migrated tables
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Alpha Releases: Docs?