Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Gary Doades
Subject Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft
Date
Msg-id 41E414AD.5020702@gpdnet.co.uk
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft  (Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com>)
List pgsql-performance
Dave Cramer wrote:
> I understand that but I have seen VM's crash.
>
> This does bring up another point. Since postgresql is not threaded a
> .NET pl would require a separate VM for each connection (unless you can
> share the vm ?). One of the java pl's (pl-j)  for postgres has dealt
> with this issue.
> For a hundred connections that's a hundred .NET vm's or java vm's.
>
> Is the .NET VM shareable ?
>
In Windows, most certainly. Not sure about mono.

Cheers,
Gary.

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: which dual-CPU hardware/OS is fastest for PostgreSQL?
Next
From: Christian Fowler
Date:
Subject: Assimilation of these "versus" and hardware threads