Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Dave Cramer
Subject Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft
Date
Msg-id 41E2F43C.5020702@fastcrypt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft  (Pierre-Frédéric Caillaud<lists@boutiquenumerique.com>)
Responses Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft
Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft
List pgsql-performance
I'm curious, why do you think that's serious ? What do you really expect
to do in the stored procedure ? Anything of consequence will seriously
degrade performance if you select it in say a million rows.

Pierre-Frédéric Caillaud wrote:

>> The .NET Runtime will be a part of the next MS SQLServer engine. You
>> will be able to have C# as a pl in the database engine with the next
>> version of MSSQL. That certainly will be something to think about.
>
>
>     Ah, well, if it's C# (or even VB.NET) then it's serious !
>     I thought postgres had pl/java ?
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
>               http://archives.postgresql.org
>
>

--
Dave Cramer
http://www.postgresintl.com
519 939 0336
ICQ#14675561


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Gary Doades
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft
Next
From: Gary Doades
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft