Tom Lane wrote:
>Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
>
>
>>Tom Lane wrote:
>>
>>
>>>What would break if we caused get_progname itself to strip the suffix?
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
>>Yes. get_progname() actually just returns a pointer to one past the last
>>directory separator it finds in its argument string. Having it strip the
>>.exe directly would in effect involve mangling argv[0]. That's what
>>makes me slightly nervous about it. We could have it strdup() the result
>>and then mangle that - note that it is called by postmaster before we
>>set up any memory context stuff.
>>
>>
>
>Seems reasonable. What I was more worried about though was whether
>there are any callers that actually need a non-stripped result.
>
>
Ok, I will have a look. grep tells me it's called in these places:
./src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c
./src/bin/initdb/initdb.c
./src/bin/pg_config/pg_config.c
./src/bin/pg_controldata/pg_controldata.c
./src/bin/pg_ctl/pg_ctl.c
./src/bin/pg_dump/pg_dump.c
./src/bin/pg_dump/pg_dumpall.c
./src/bin/pg_dump/pg_restore.c
./src/bin/pg_resetxlog/pg_resetxlog.c
./src/bin/psql/startup.c
./src/bin/scripts/clusterdb.c
./src/bin/scripts/common.c
./src/bin/scripts/createdb.c
./src/bin/scripts/createlang.c
./src/bin/scripts/createuser.c
./src/bin/scripts/dropdb.c
./src/bin/scripts/droplang.c
./src/bin/scripts/dropuser.c
./src/bin/scripts/vacuumdb.c
./src/interfaces/ecpg/preproc/ecpg.c
cheers
andrew
