Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Postgres insert performance and storage requirement compared to Oracle - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Divakar Singh
Subject Re: Postgres insert performance and storage requirement compared to Oracle
Date
Msg-id 415787.11817.qm@web65404.mail.ac4.yahoo.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Postgres insert performance and storage requirement compared to Oracle  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-performance
Tree view
Hi Joshua,
I have been only using libpq.
Is libpqXX better than the other?
Is there any notable facility in libpqxx which could aid in fast inserts or better performance in general?
 
Best Regards,
Divakar


From: Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>
To: Divakar Singh <dpsmails@yahoo.com>
Cc: Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>; pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Sent: Tue, October 26, 2010 12:08:52 AM
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Postgres insert performance and storage requirement compared to Oracle

On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 11:36 -0700, Divakar Singh wrote:
> 
> 68 Rows inserted: 100,000
> Above results show good INSERT performance of PG when using SQL
> procedures. But
> performance when I use C++ lib is very bad. I did that test some time
> back so I
> do not have data for that right now.

This is interesting, are you using libpq or libpqXX?

Joshua D. Drake


>
>
--
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 509.416.6579
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering
http://twitter.com/cmdpromptinc | http://identi.ca/commandprompt


--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Steve Singer
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgres insert performance and storage requirement compared to Oracle
Next
From: Merlin Moncure
Date:
Subject: Re: AIX slow buffer reads