Re: Postgres insert performance and storage requirement compared to Oracle - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: Postgres insert performance and storage requirement compared to Oracle
Date
Msg-id 1288031932.8930.32.camel@jd-desktop
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Postgres insert performance and storage requirement compared to Oracle  (Divakar Singh <dpsmails@yahoo.com>)
Responses Re: Postgres insert performance and storage requirement compared to Oracle
List pgsql-performance
On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 11:36 -0700, Divakar Singh wrote:
>
> 68 Rows inserted: 100,000
> Above results show good INSERT performance of PG when using SQL
> procedures. But
> performance when I use C++ lib is very bad. I did that test some time
> back so I
> do not have data for that right now.

This is interesting, are you using libpq or libpqXX?

Joshua D. Drake


>
>
--
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 509.416.6579
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering
http://twitter.com/cmdpromptinc | http://identi.ca/commandprompt


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Divakar Singh
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgres insert performance and storage requirement compared to Oracle
Next
From: Steve Singer
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgres insert performance and storage requirement compared to Oracle