Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> writes:
> I don't object to the addition of this patch in next CF as this
> presents no new concept. Still per the complications this patch and
> because it is a complicated patch I was wondering if people are fine
> to include it in this last CF.
The March CF is already looking pretty daunting. We can try to include
this but I won't be too surprised if it gets punted to a future CF.
regards, tom lane
