Re: [HACKERS] REINDEX CONCURRENTLY 2.0 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [HACKERS] REINDEX CONCURRENTLY 2.0
Date
Msg-id 20170227224118.GF421@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] REINDEX CONCURRENTLY 2.0  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 05:31:21PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> writes:
> > I don't object to the addition of this patch in next CF as this
> > presents no new concept. Still per the complications this patch and
> > because it is a complicated patch I was wondering if people are fine
> > to include it in this last CF.
> 
> The March CF is already looking pretty daunting.  We can try to include
> this but I won't be too surprised if it gets punted to a future CF.

Yeah, that was my reaction too.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I.  As I am, so you will be. +
+                      Ancient Roman grave inscription +



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] REINDEX CONCURRENTLY 2.0
Next
From: Alexander Korotkov
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017