> My understanding is also that there are an increasing amount of people
> that don't like this model. They want the core team to package their
> specialized needs along with the core db and support it as one. Or,
> maybe said another way, they want all their features to come from one
> entity and be supported by that entity.
>
> Seems like what we have here is a golden opportunity for a business.
> Though, aren't there already such redhat-like consulting businesses for
> postgres?
What you are talking about is my Company. Command Prompt, Inc. or SRA
with PowerGres. Command Prompt and SRA both offer PostgreSQL
"distributions".
In fact SRA offers a native Win32 version that is threaded already.
Command Prompt offers its Mammoth line for Linux/OSX and Solaris and it
includes replication.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>
> Aug 23, 2004, at 1:03 PM, Thomas Hallgren wrote:
>
>>>
>> Your customers and many of your contributors would really like to see
>> PostgreSQL become more then just the core backend. A Redhat bundle is
>> great if your'e a Redhat user. If you are on another platform however,
>> it's no good to you. And some bundle from "a group of ppl" or "someone"?
>> No, sorry, that won't cut it either. It's just not the same thing at all.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Thomas Hallgren
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>> TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-667-4564 - jd@commandprompt.com - http://www.commandprompt.com
Mammoth PostgreSQL Replicator. Integrated Replication for PostgreSQL
