Re: pgadmin3 not compliant with gcc-3.4 (?) - Mailing list pgadmin-hackers

Raphaël Enrici wrote:
>
>
> Seems gcc team does not agree...
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11174
> They are the ones coming to the conclusion quoted before.
>
> Can you tell me where I can find the C++ spec they are all talking about
> please ?

http://www.csci.csusb.edu/dick/c++std/cd2/index.html
AFAIK the original ansi specs are not available without horrible fees, I
hope the link above contains accurate data.

Apparently, the spec *does* specify this brain dead restriction.
We have three alternatives to fix that:
- declare OnChange public. Maybe I should rearrange my knowledge to drop
the 'protected' keyword completely.
- Invent an intermediate class empty class above the current dlgProperty
  without any methods just to create an accessible target.
- deny 3.4 support

Regards,
Andreas