Re: pgadmin3 not compliant with gcc-3.4 (?) - Mailing list pgadmin-hackers

From Raphaël Enrici
Subject Re: pgadmin3 not compliant with gcc-3.4 (?)
Date
Msg-id 411F547E.5060804@club-internet.fr
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pgadmin3 not compliant with gcc-3.4 (?)  (Andreas Pflug <pgadmin@pse-consulting.de>)
Responses Re: pgadmin3 not compliant with gcc-3.4 (?)  (Andreas Pflug <pgadmin@pse-consulting.de>)
List pgadmin-hackers
Andreas Pflug wrote:
> Raphaël Enrici wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Seems gcc team does not agree...
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11174
>> They are the ones coming to the conclusion quoted before.
>>
>> Can you tell me where I can find the C++ spec they are all talking
>> about please ?
>
>
> http://www.csci.csusb.edu/dick/c++std/cd2/index.html

thanks.

> AFAIK the original ansi specs are not available without horrible fees, I
> hope the link above contains accurate data.

ah... I forgot we were not all "free". ;)

>
> Apparently, the spec *does* specify this brain dead restriction.

oh.

> We have three alternatives to fix that:
> - declare OnChange public. Maybe I should rearrange my knowledge to drop
> the 'protected' keyword completely.
> - Invent an intermediate class empty class above the current dlgProperty
>  without any methods just to create an accessible target.

They are both solutions I've seen in other projects where they faced
this issue.

> - deny 3.4 support

Impossible for me! Our wxWid does not build with gcc 3.3.x due to a
compiler issue fixed in 3.4.x branch. g++ 3.4.x is the only solution I
have to get actual pgAdmin III into debian... unless I move back to 2.95
series but IIRC there was problem with it.

Regards,
Raphaël

pgadmin-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andreas Pflug
Date:
Subject: 8.0 doc
Next
From: cvs@cvs.pgadmin.org
Date:
Subject: CVS Commit by andreas: weird spec workaround for gcc 3.4