Re: Version Numbering -- The great debate - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Christopher Kings-Lynne
Subject Re: Version Numbering -- The great debate
Date
Msg-id 410C6FAB.2040202@familyhealth.com.au
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Version Numbering -- The great debate  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Version Numbering -- The great debate  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Re: Version Numbering -- The great debate  (Steve Atkins <steve@blighty.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
>>This is more features worth mentioning than we've ever had in a single release 
>>before -- and if you consider several add-ons which have been 
>>implemented/improved at the same time (Slony, PL/Java, etc.) it's even more 
>>momentous.   If this isn't 8.0, then what will be?   
> 
> 
> I tend to agree, and was about to bring up the point myself.

I'm in favour of 8.0.  There's a time to be humble and a time for hard 
work to be properly recognised.

Chris



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Christopher Kings-Lynne
Date:
Subject: Re: Version Numbering -- The great debate
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Version Numbering -- The great debate