Re: Version Numbering -- The great debate - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Version Numbering -- The great debate
Date
Msg-id 4010.1091319264@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Version Numbering -- The great debate  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Responses Re: Version Numbering -- The great debate  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Re: Version Numbering -- The great debate  (Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>)
List pgsql-hackers
Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
> Even if Savepoints don't make it, we'll still have:

Savepoints are in, as is exception-trapping in functions (at least
plpgsql, the other PLs are on their own :-().

Some other major improvements you didn't mention:

Cross-datatype comparisons are indexable (at least for common
combinations); this solves a huge performance gotcha

Dependency-aware pg_dump

Much more complete support for rowtype operations


> This is more features worth mentioning than we've ever had in a single release 
> before -- and if you consider several add-ons which have been 
> implemented/improved at the same time (Slony, PL/Java, etc.) it's even more 
> momentous.   If this isn't 8.0, then what will be?   

I tend to agree, and was about to bring up the point myself.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Version Numbering -- The great debate
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: About pgevent