Re: replication only - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Henry
Subject Re: replication only
Date
Msg-id 40cc0752755087fc0ebe3b57724ee52f.squirrel@zenmail.co.za
Whole thread Raw
In response to replication only  (Jef Peeraer <jef.peeraer@telenet.be>)
Responses Re: replication only  (Andrew Sullivan <ajs@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Tue, August 5, 2008 9:21 am, Jef Peeraer wrote:
>
> i read about the replication possibilities with postgresql. If i just need
> some replication ( without failover stuff ) to 1 standby server, what
> would be the best option to go with. Slony i presume, although schema
> chanages are not propagated.

Skytools (http://pgfoundry.org/projects/skytools/) has a considerably
lower learning curve compared to Slony.  Nothing wrong with Slony, but
recovering from replication problems with skytools is far easier, and it's
just much simpler to use -- not as flexible and as powerful as Slony, but
if all you need to do is replicate some tables with minimum fuss and
without having to learn a new language, then Skytools (based on my
personal experience with a cluster and Slony versus Skytools) is my
recommendation.

Regards
Henry


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Matthew T. O'Connor"
Date:
Subject: Re: Vacuum Vs Vacuum Full
Next
From: "Scott Marlowe"
Date:
Subject: Re: replication only