On 4 Jul 2004 at 13:07, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> We very much do *not* want to go grant a privilege to administrator that
> it doesn't already have. If it is required, it should be done manually
> by the administrator himself.
>
> (Oh, and the resource kit is very much *NOT* free. It's a licensed
> product like others. The supplement is like a servicepack - you still
> need the original kit license)
>
Once again you are right. I thought that you may be able to only grant
the permission for the duration of initdb etc, but there are other
problems with this anyway.
One other thought. I bit OTT maybe, but if NT does not have a "runas"
service then why not make one? As we know this is not a problem in
2000 onwards as the "RunAs" service exists. It should be possible to
create a service just for the purpose of running initdb (or postmaster). A
service running as local system has the privileges required I believe. If
the service could only start initdb/postmaster then it should not pose a
security risk.
Cheers,
Gary.
