Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From David Garamond
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?
Date
Msg-id 40C18429.2010508@zara.6.isreserved.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?  (Enrico Weigelt <weigelt@metux.de>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?  (Markus Bertheau <twanger@bluetwanger.de>)
Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?  (Dave Page <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>)
List pgsql-advocacy
This probably has been discussed and is probably a very minor point, but
consider how many more years we want to be able to use the <single
digit>.<single digit> major release numbering.

Assuming 1 year between major releases (7.3.0 -> 7.4.0 = +- 1 year),
then we have 7.5-9.9 = 26 years = up until +- jul 2030. if we skip to
8.0 now, then we have up until 2023.

Also we have 1 more chance to skip major number: 8.x -> 9.0. Imagine
what features will there be in 9.0 that is ground-breaking enough.
Because after that, we don't have any more major number to jump into
without going into 2 digits.

I personally don't see the major number as a very magical thing. Look at
Linux for example. People still see 2.6 as very different/ahead compared
to 2.4...

--
dave

pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: Evan Rempel
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL certifications?
Next
From: Markus Bertheau
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?