-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Dave Page wrote:
|>-----Original Message-----
|>From: Gaetano Mendola [mailto:mendola@bigfoot.com]
|>Sent: 17 May 2004 16:02
|>To: Bruno Wolff III
|>Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
|>Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Email data type
|>
|>About the domain literals, I think to validate it in the near
|>future, rejecting private subnet according to this list:
|>
|>10.0.0.0 - 10.255.255.255
|>172.16.0.0 - 172.31.255.255
|>192.168.0.0 - 192.168.255.255
|>169.254.0.0 -169.254.255.255
|
|
| Why? What's wrong with private addresses?
Well I think that accept an email like:
gmendola@192.168.212.2
is a risky.
It's true that any RFC forbid this kind of emails,
so I can accept it and leave to the final user the
opportunity to extract the domain an validate it.
Regards
Gaetano Mendola
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFAqOHm7UpzwH2SGd4RAp4dAJwNqDSws1cVwKr/QMXG/JvV/8M94QCbBfIS
alixKQYe/VoLpwXrBFHszDs=
=BAML
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
