Re: CLUSTER locking - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Christopher Kings-Lynne
Subject Re: CLUSTER locking
Date
Msg-id 409F7517.4080407@familyhealth.com.au
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: CLUSTER locking  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: CLUSTER locking
List pgsql-hackers
> No.  Committing the relfilenode swap would cut the knees off of any
> active scan on the old file.

Could it upgrade its lock to exclusive just before doing the swap?

Chris



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Euler Taveira de Oliveira
Date:
Subject: Re: Comments on all system objects
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: CLUSTER locking