Home > mailing lists

Re: CLUSTER locking - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From	Christopher Kings-Lynne
Subject	Re: CLUSTER locking
Date	May 10, 2004 12:27:20
Msg-id	409F7517.4080407@familyhealth.com.au Whole thread Raw
In response to	Re: CLUSTER locking (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses	Re: CLUSTER locking (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List	pgsql-hackers

Tree view

> No.  Committing the relfilenode swap would cut the knees off of any
> active scan on the old file.

Could it upgrade its lock to exclusive just before doing the swap?

Chris

pgsql-hackers by date:

From: Euler Taveira de Oliveira
Date: 10 May 2004, 12:12:30
Subject: Re: Comments on all system objects

From: Tom Lane
Date: 10 May 2004, 13:07:20
Subject: Re: CLUSTER locking

Re: CLUSTER locking - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

Previous

Next