On Wed, 2026-07-15 at 20:53 +0530, Dilip Kumar wrote:
> Thanks for the review
Looks good to me, thank you for the patch. I will commit this soon.
To address Noah's concern: is the concern about the dependency link, or
about having a database-specific oid in a shared catalog at all?
If the former, then we could do the same work manually outside of the
pg_depend mechanism.
If the latter, we could decompose pg_subscription into the columns
necessary for the launcher (shared catalog) and the database-specific
columns (unshared catalog). But that's more invasive so it might not be
v19 material.
Thoughts?
Regards,
Jeff Davis
