Tom Lane wrote:<br /><blockquote cite="mid8707.1083373014@sss.pgh.pa.us" type="cite"><pre wrap="">Fabien COELHO <a
class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"href="mailto:coelho@cri.ensmp.fr"><coelho@cri.ensmp.fr></a> writes:
</pre><blockquotetype="cite"><pre wrap="">As a "temporary" fix, what about "_ANY" and "_SOME" as aggregate names?
</pre></blockquote><prewrap="">
Ick :-(. The use of leading underscores is an ugly C-ism that we should
not propagate into SQL names.
</pre></blockquote> I second this... the whole __ is hard to type and remember.<br /><br /> Sincerely,<br /><br />
JoshuaD. Drake<br /><br /><br /><br /><blockquote cite="mid8707.1083373014@sss.pgh.pa.us" type="cite"><pre wrap="">How
aboutbool_or() and bool_and()? Or at least something based on OR
and AND? I don't find ANY/ALL to be particularly mnemonic for this
usage anyway.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
href="mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org">majordomo@postgresql.org</a></pre></blockquote><br /><br /><pre
class="moz-signature"cols="72">--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-667-4564 - <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:jd@commandprompt.com">jd@commandprompt.com</a> - <a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"href="http://www.commandprompt.com">http://www.commandprompt.com</a>
PostgreSQL Replicator -- production quality replication for PostgreSQL</pre>
