Re: backup manifests - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Fujii Masao
Subject Re: backup manifests
Date
Msg-id 40673857-035b-1087-bb18-393873679465@oss.nttdata.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: backup manifests  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
List pgsql-hackers

On 2020/04/09 23:10, Stephen Frost wrote:
> Greetings,
> 
> * Fujii Masao (masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com) wrote:
>> On 2020/04/09 2:35, Robert Haas wrote:
>>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 1:15 AM Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> wrote:
>>>> When there is a backup_manifest in the database cluster, it's included in
>>>> the backup even when --no-manifest is specified. ISTM that this is problematic
>>>> because the backup_manifest is obviously not valid for the backup.
>>>> So, isn't it better to always exclude the *existing* backup_manifest in the
>>>> cluster from the backup, like backup_label/tablespace_map? Patch attached.
>>>>
>>>> Also I found the typo in the document. Patch attached.
>>>
>>> Both patches look good. The second one is definitely a mistake on my
>>> part, and the first one seems like a totally reasonable change.
>>> Thanks!
>>
>> Thanks for reviewing them! I pushed them.
>>
>> Please note that the commit messages have not been delivered to
>> pgsql-committers yet.
> 
> They've been released and your address whitelisted.

Many thanks!!

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: backup manifests
Next
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] advanced partition matching algorithm forpartition-wise join