Hi!
Dave Page wrote:
> Note that I've only briefly looked at it due to time contraints, but as
> this cvs module isn't live yet it didn't make much sense to leave it
> unapplied any longer.
>
> If that makes any sense at all....
Speaking of which, what is the real reason for keeping the current website and
the "next-generation" one in one project?
Maybe a better approach would be to register a separate project for the
next-generation website (I think this was already proposed here)?
