Hi,
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 10:20 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
<heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> Thanks. This patch seems to be missing the new readahead.c file. I grabbed
> that from the previous patch version.
Oh, sorry for the mistake. I changed one of Suzuki-san's patches
to be rebased to HEAD again (readahead-20090310.patch).
The other (addShBufCheck-20090120.patch) is not changed.
Comment:
we might reach consistent recovery state *before* redoing the safe
starting point, because readahead slightly delays the actual redo.
Is this safe? If not, the readahead queue should be flushed before
reaching that state?
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
