On 6/20/21 12:34 PM, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
> Am Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 01:47:47PM -0400 schrieb Tom Lane:
>
>> Hence, the only way to make this scenario work would be for the
>> restore script to explicitly override default_transaction_read_only.
> [...]
>> Also, doing so would result in ignoring default_transaction_read_only
>> no matter what the source of that was. I think it's probably not
>> hard to construct scenarios where someone would really not be happy
>> about such behavior.
>
> Any chance pg_dump (and/or pg_restore) might gain an option
> --ignore-read-only ? That way, PostgreSQL need not decide
> for users.
How about:
1) pg_dump -Fc -d read_only_db -U postgres -f read_only.out
2) In new cluster:
A) psql -d postgres -U postgres
CREATE DATABASE read_only;
B) pg_restore -d read_only -U postgres read_only.out
C) psql -d read_only -U postgres
alter database read_only SET default_transaction_read_only TO 'on';
>
> Thanks,
> Karsten
> --
> GPG 40BE 5B0E C98E 1713 AFA6 5BC0 3BEA AC80 7D4F C89B
>
>
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
