On 10/25/2018 03:53 PM, Chapman Flack wrote:
> On 10/25/18 10:39 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I think getting out from under libxml2's idiosyncrasies and security
>> lapses would be great, but is there a plausible alternative out there?
>
> Depends on whether anything in [1] sounds plausible.
The libraries we depend on should really either be available in the
package repositories of the major Linux distribution or be something we
can put in our own repository and maintain without too much pain. So
using Saxon/C does not seem like a realistic option.
Andreas
