Re: [PATCHES] fork/exec patch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: [PATCHES] fork/exec patch
Date
Msg-id 3FDCF5BA.5030608@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: [PATCHES] fork/exec patch  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
[moved to hackers / win32]

Claudio Natoli wrote:

>Or do people have strong leanings towards "fix as you go along"? Just feels
>like that way could see us getting bogged down making things "perfect"
>instead of advancing the port...
>
>
>

w.r.t. Win32, I think the way to proceed is (in this order):
. make it work
. make it elegant
. make it fast

BTW, I agree with Bruce, you're doing excellent stuff. Now for the fun
part (signals).

cheers

andrew


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Walker/mutator prototype.
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Walker/mutator prototype.