Gaetano Mendola wrote:
>
> Right, anyway there was typos in the translation, and my vi was unable
> to display: è, à. Anyway is a common stuff and well accepted have a'
> instead of à.
Hi Gaetano,
in the era of unicode I don't quite see why this needs to be
acceptable... I wouldn't accept it.
It appears that vi isn't quite the bleeding-edge editor of *.po files
for non-ascii languages...
How about using KBabel or poEdit?
Regards,
Andreas
