Re: [PERFORM] Best tweak for fast results.. ? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Dennis Gearon
Subject Re: [PERFORM] Best tweak for fast results.. ?
Date
Msg-id 3F4B9808.1080804@fireserve.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PERFORM] Best tweak for fast results.. ?  (Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>)
List pgsql-general
actually, isin't 1000 tps pretty good?

Ron Johnson wrote:

>On Tue, 2003-08-26 at 08:42, JM wrote:
>
>
>>need input on parameter values on confs...
>>
>>our database is getting 1000 transactions/sec on peak periods..
>>
>>sitting on RH 7.3
>>2.4.7-10smp
>>RAM: 1028400
>>SWAP: 2040244
>>
>>queries are just simple select statements based on timestamps, varchars...
>>less on joins... on a 300K rows..
>>
>>
>
>Could it be that 1000tps is as good as your h/w can do?  You didn't
>mention what kind and speed of CPU(s), SCSI-or-IDE controller(s) and
>type/speed of disk(s) you have.
>
>
>


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Dennis Gearon
Date:
Subject: Re: is linux ready for databases ? (Ziff Davis article
Next
From: Hervé Piedvache (by way ofHervé Piedvache
Date:
Subject: Re: WAL Files checkpoint_timeout with voluminous delete/insert