Raphaël Enrici wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I did a big mistake when I began to number debian packages...
> I versioned them like this :
> pgadmin3-x.y.z-YYYYMMDD.w
> where x.y.z is the pgadmin3 version number, YYYYMMDD is the snapshot
> tag and w is a minor release number for the package.
> As this is unofficial packages, I should have numbered the packages at
> least like this :
> pgadmin3-x.y.z-0.YYYYMMDD.w
> This rule is better to handle future official release where the
> package release number is greater or equal to "1".
>
> What are you planning to do concerning the pgAdmin3 version number for
> the beta release ?
> Will this stay 0.8.0 ? Or will this become something else greater than
> 0.8.0 (would be nice...) ? Does someone has an idea of the date this
> release is planned ?
>
> Thanks all and sorry for this BIG mistake...
Hi Raphaël,
so far we don't have an agreed schema of numbering, so this is the right
moment to make proposals and decide.
IMHO, the first beta will be 0.90, following development versions 0.91,
the second beta 0.92, ...
Regards,
Andreas
