A more ambitious project, and one which seems to me worthwhile, would be
a descriptive tour of the source code and data structures. Something
larger than an FAQ and (one hopes) smaller than a book. The existence of
such things is useful in bootstrapping newbies (like me) in Linux kernel
stuff, and with it I would feel more confident about dipping my toes in
on Pg as well.
And, no, I can't write it because I am one who would need it in the
first place. I guess those who could write it have plenty on their plates.
Keeping it up to date would be a pain too.
But still, it would be nice.
andrew
Robert Treat wrote:
>On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 02:47, Philip Yarra wrote:
>
>
>>On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 04:27 pm, nolan@celery.tssi.com wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Just part of the baptism of fire for a newbie, I guess. :-)
>>>
>>>
>>I've found the learning curve pretty steep too. Is it worth putting together
>>some of these 'gotchas' into a neophyte-developer-FAQ?
>>
>>
>>
>
>There nothing stopping you from submitting improved wording for the FAQ
>if you think it would be helpful.
>
>Robert Treat
>
>
