Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
>>See my followup. Which bits of info would you like to see added that
>>SHOW doesn't reveal?
>
> Unlike andreas, I'm not interested in the types and ranges of values, what I
> need to know is the GUC variables that the user is allowed to set, in
> particular what they can ALTER USER / SET ... so that I can display that
> feature...
>
I was considering adding this and the stuff Andreas requested to
pg_settings (but not "SHOW ALL" or "SHOW x" unless people feel it's
important to kept them consistent with pg_settings). Were the Red Hat
guys going to do this?
Joe
