Re: [pgsql-advocacy] interesting PHP/MySQL thread - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Erik Price
Subject Re: [pgsql-advocacy] interesting PHP/MySQL thread
Date
Msg-id 3EF76295.3030104@ptc.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [pgsql-advocacy] interesting PHP/MySQL thread  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general

Tom Lane wrote:

> I'd be happy if PHP would adopt a database-neutral stance, ie, nothing
> in particular bundled into their core distribution.  That might not be
> compatible with their project goals though.  Anyone have a feeling about
> how important it is to them to have bundled DB support?  Maybe we could
> talk them into bundling more than one DB interface --- if they put both
> PG and SQlite support into their distro, that'd be fine with me too.

On that note, last I read, MySQL is planning to offer PHP as a language
for writing stored procedures when the features is made available in the
5.0 release.


Erik


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Carlos Oliva"
Date:
Subject: Re: Eliminating start error message: "unary operator
Next
From: Erik Price
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] interesting PHP/MySQL thread