Re: PG "Users" page?

From: Dave Page
Subject: Re: PG "Users" page?
Date: ,
Msg-id: 3EF2978D-0D4B-490B-872C-7E964AD69255@pgadmin.org
(view: Whole thread, Raw)
In response to: PG "Users" page?  (Justin Clift)
Responses: Re: PG "Users" page?  (Justin Clift)
Re: PG "Users" page?  (Magnus Hagander)
List: pgsql-advocacy

Tree view

PG "Users" page?  (Justin Clift, )
 Re: PG "Users" page?  (Dave Page, )
  Re: PG "Users" page?  (Justin Clift, )
   Re: PG "Users" page?  (Justin Clift, )
   Re: PG "Users" page?  (Dave Page, )
    Re: [MASSMAIL]Re: PG "Users" page?  ("Gilberto Castillo", )
  Re: PG "Users" page?  (Magnus Hagander, )
   Re: PG "Users" page?  ("Jonathan S. Katz", )
    Re: PG "Users" page?  (Damien Clochard, )
     Re: PG "Users" page?  (Petr Jelinek, )
     Re: PG "Users" page?  (Justin Clift, )


> On 11 Sep 2016, at 16:55, Justin Clift <> wrote:
>
> Hi us,
>
> Just noticed that our Featured Users page has “Sun Microsystems” listed:
>
>  https://www.postgresql.org/about/users/
>  (Under “Technology” at the bottom)
>
> Should we update that to say “Oracle” :D … or maybe just nuke that entry?

That page is completely unmaintained. I proposed removing it a couple of years back, but was met with strong objections
coupledwith a complete lack of volunteers to actually do the work to keep it up to date. 

I strongly feel it should be removed still - it is probably responsible for 25% of emails to webmaster@ from random
companiesrequesting inclusion. 


pgsql-advocacy by date:

From: Dave Page
Date:
Subject: Re: PG "Users" page?
From: "Gilberto Castillo"
Date:
Subject: Re: [MASSMAIL]Re: PG "Users" page?