Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
>>>1. Do we want to someday allow groups to have groups as members? (Seems
>>>reasonable to me.)
>>>
>>>
>>I agree.
>>
>>
>
>I think the other requirement of roles is that they are able to own objects.
>ie. we need to allow groups to own objects.
>
>
>
This would also solve the problem that information_schema views will
show only owned objects. If objects are created as owned by a proper
role, not only the creator will be able to use these views.
Regards,
Andreas
