Re: Nested transactions: low level stuff - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Hiroshi Inoue
Subject Re: Nested transactions: low level stuff
Date
Msg-id 3E793D71.949D597D@tpf.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Nested transactions: low level stuff  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Nested transactions: low level stuff  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> 
> Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
> > > > Vadim planned to implement the savepoints functionality
> > > > using UNDO mechanism. AFAIR it was never denied explicitly.
> > >
> > > If you go to the TODO.detail/transactions archive, there was discussion
> > > of using UNDO, and most felt that there were too many problems of having
> > > to manage the undo system,
> >
> > This is closely related to the basics of PostgreSQL.
> > Pleas don't decide it implicitly.
> 
> We took a vote and UNDO lost --- do you want to do another vote?

Sorry I missed the vote. Where is it ?

regards,
Hiroshi Inouehttp://www.geocities.jp/inocchichichi/psqlodbc/


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: A bad behavior under autocommit off mode
Next
From: Neil Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: A bad behavior under autocommit off mode