Re: Nested transactions: low level stuff - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Nested transactions: low level stuff
Date
Msg-id 200303200351.h2K3pud06705@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Nested transactions: low level stuff  (Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue@tpf.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
> > > Vadim planned to implement the savepoints functionality
> > > using UNDO mechanism. AFAIR it was never denied explicitly.
> > 
> > If you go to the TODO.detail/transactions archive, there was discussion
> > of using UNDO, and most felt that there were too many problems of having
> > to manage the undo system,
> 
> This is closely related to the basics of PostgreSQL.
> Pleas don't decide it implicitly.

We took a vote and UNDO lost --- do you want to do another vote?

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Faster NUMERIC implementation
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Nested transactions: low level stuff