Re: ecpg vs. libpq - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Shridhar Daithankar
Subject Re: ecpg vs. libpq
Date
Msg-id 3E564E0D.11011.4A08A30@localhost
Whole thread Raw
In response to ecpg vs. libpq  (Christoph Haller <ch@rodos.fzk.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 21 Feb 2003 at 11:26, Christoph Haller wrote:

> 
> I am wondering if there is any difference in performance between
> using ecpg and libpq. If I understand the concept of ecpg correctly,
> calls to the lecpg interface are internally converted to calls to libpq.
> 
> So there is no big difference at all. Is this right?

That is correct but there are some other differences.

1. Obviously ecpg is simpler to use.
2. libpq is almost thread safe. ecpg is not. It is work in progress.
3. ecpg can not be C++ in itself, libpq can be.

Just about it..

ByeShridhar

--
Drew's Law of Highway Biology:    The first bug to hit a clean windshield lands 
directly in front    of your eyes.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Bytea misconceptions
Next
From: Christoph Haller
Date:
Subject: ecpg vs. libpq