Re: Strange behaviour of JDBC driver for PostgreSQL - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc

From Carlos Correia
Subject Re: Strange behaviour of JDBC driver for PostgreSQL
Date
Msg-id 3E00B691.10401@m16e.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Strange behaviour of JDBC driver for PostgreSQL  (Fernando Nasser <fnasser@redhat.com>)
Responses Re: Strange behaviour of JDBC driver for PostgreSQL  (Thomas O'Dowd <tom@nooper.com>)
List pgsql-jdbc
Fernando,

i am sure the db is version 7.2.2

Thanks anyway,

Carlos

Fernando Nasser wrote:

> Carlos Correia wrote:
>
>>
>> Dave Cramer wrote:
>>
>>> Carlos,
>>>
>>> Is this a new message today, or one from yesterday?
>>>
>>>
>> Dave,
>>
>> It is the same messge, but as I think that everyone is
>> misunderstooding the problem, I'll try to resume it:
>>
>> 1. I don't know why the driver reports version 6.5.2, as I don't have
>> such a version.
>
>
> The JDBC driver receives the version from the database backend when
> connecting and that is what is printed by the
> getDatabaseProductVersion() function.  There is no way it can generate
> a 6.x.x version number by itself.
>
> You _must_ be connecting to a 6.5.2 backend.
>
>



pgsql-jdbc by date:

Previous
From: Fernando Nasser
Date:
Subject: Re: Strange behaviour of JDBC driver for PostgreSQL
Next
From: Anders Hermansen
Date:
Subject: Re: (forw) [bfl@florianbruckner.com: AW: Reversedb tool and getPrimaryKeys]