Bruce Momjian wrote:> This is a pretty sizable patch, and there was discussion
about it.
On which there were objections that were not addressed. I, for instance,
complained about the addition of a syntax that is neither SQL not Oracle. And
the last version of the patch still has it.
Also, I felt that there was a consensus that we should implement the SQL99 (and
DB2) recursive queries instead because:
1) It is the _standard_
2) The Oracle clause is less generic (less powerful) than the standard
3) One can add the Oracle weird clause as a syntactic sugar to a specific
recursive query construct (as I have shown in one posting)
4) Adding the Oracle clause as a hack may prevent us to implement the real SQL thing
--
Fernando Nasser
Red Hat - Toronto E-Mail: fnasser@redhat.com
2323 Yonge Street, Suite #300
Toronto, Ontario M4P 2C9