Re: transactions - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Shridhar Daithankar
Subject Re: transactions
Date
Msg-id 3DB45407.22160.AC7AED2@localhost
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: transactions  (Harald Fuchs <hf@colibri.de>)
List pgsql-general
On 17 Oct 2002 at 11:47, Harald Fuchs wrote:

> In article <200210161647.g9GGl4t08435@candle.pha.pa.us>,
> pgman@candle.pha.pa.us (Bruce Momjian) writes:
>
> >> To be fair, in the Oracle posting, they actually said PostgreSQL
> >> lacked the "transactional features" of "any commercial enterprise
> >> database".  While that is presumably something beyond just
> >> "transactions", I was completely unclear about what it was supposed
> >> actually to be.  Anyone got any ideas?
>
> > They were confusing us with MySQL.  It was a marketing guy.
>
> ... who didn't know that MySQL _does_ support transactions :-)

So innodb is default now?

Bye
 Shridhar

--
Male, n.:    A member of the unconsidered, or negligible sex.  The male of the
human race is commonly known to the female as Mere Man.  The genus    has two
varieties:  good providers and bad providers.        -- Ambrose Bierce, "The Devil's
Dictionary"


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Erwan DUROSELLE"
Date:
Subject: Rép. : pgAdmin II connection problem
Next
From: "Shridhar Daithankar"
Date:
Subject: Re: select into without creating new table