Re: [GENERAL] Large databases, performance - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Shridhar Daithankar
Subject Re: [GENERAL] Large databases, performance
Date
Msg-id 3DA33C03.31407.15BBAE9C@localhost
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] Large databases, performance  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-performance
On 8 Oct 2002 at 10:38, Tom Lane wrote:

> Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net> writes:
> It's not simpler: it's more complicated, because you need an additional
> input item to figure out the size of any given column in a record.
> Making sure that that info is available every place it's needed is one
> of the costs of supporting a feature like this.

I understand. Can we put this in say page header instead of tuple header. While
all the arguments you have put are really good, the stellar redundancy
certainly can do with a mid-way solution.

Just a thought..

Bye
 Shridhar

--
bit, n:    A unit of measure applied to color.  Twenty-four-bit color    refers to
expensive $3 color as opposed to the cheaper 25    cent, or two-bit, color that
use to be available a few years ago.


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Large databases, performance
Next
From: Ron Johnson
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Large databases, performance