Re: pgaccess - where to store the own data - Mailing list pgsql-interfaces

From Joe Conway
Subject Re: pgaccess - where to store the own data
Date
Msg-id 3D6F9490.9040507@joeconway.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to pgaccess - where to store the own data  ("Iavor Raytchev" <iavor.raytchev@verysmall.org>)
Responses Re: pgaccess - where to store the own data  (terry <tg5027@citlink.net>)
Re: [HACKERS] pgaccess - where to store the own data  (Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>)
List pgsql-interfaces
Iavor Raytchev wrote:
> Hello everybody,
> 
> There is an open question we need broad opinion on.
> 
> Currently pgaccess stores its own data in the database it works with.
> Some people do not like that. To store it elsewhere invokes a number of
> issues such as:
> 
> - where is this somewhere
> - converting form all versions to the new
> - etc.
> 
> What do people think about this. Is it so bad that the own data is
> stored in the database pgaccess works with?
> 

I don't particularly like it. Oracle deals with this by having a 
database unto itself as a management repository (Oracle Enterprise 
Manager, OEM, I believe). You register the database you want to manage 
with the repository, and the metadata is kept there instead of in each 
managed database.

Joe



pgsql-interfaces by date:

Previous
From: "Iavor Raytchev"
Date:
Subject: pgaccess - where to store the own data
Next
From: Joe Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pgaccess - where to store the own data