>
>
>Isn't RedHat the primary commercial entity pushing PostgreSQL these days?
>See http://www.redhat.com/software/database/
>
Actually I don't see much marketing from RedHat on their version at all.
I see more from ourselves ;), dbExperts and PgSQL, Inc. Command Prompt,
and dbExperts both actually advertise.
>} 'PostgreSQL Inc' but they merely offer commercial support etc.
>
>Did anyone notice if RedHat was visibly pushing their database product, or
>the PostgreSQL name?
>
There major push appears to be for RedHat DB. Which is PostgreSQL but
only mentioned in the FAQ's.
>
>} If you read the histtory of mySQL you'll know that mySQL was essentially
>} a company first (TcX Datakonsult AB) while postgreSQL has essentiually
>} remained in the academic/open source environment. Remember also that it
>} wasn't that long ago the mySQL was GPL'ed. It's all in the history :)
>
>What license is PostgreSQL, anyway? I never did find out when I was looking
>for it.
>
>} Cheers,
>} Graeme
>--Greg
>
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
>http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
>
>
