Personally, I have to agree with Tom,
Silly versioning like that is for marketing teams and microsoft ;-)
<sarcasm>How about the next version be released as PostgreSQL
XP</sarcasm>
Tom Lane wrote:
>
> "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au> writes:
> > Doesn't this seem like postgresql 8.0, rather than 7.3?
>
> It took us five years to go from 6.0 to 7.0 ... I don't think we
> need talk about 8.0 for awhile yet.
>
> I'm not in favor of arbitrary "release number inflation". A release
> is a release, whatever you call it.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
--
Colin Faber
(303) 859-1491
fpsn.net, Inc.
