Re: Threaded PosgreSQL server - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Haroldo Stenger
Subject Re: Threaded PosgreSQL server
Date
Msg-id 3C602389.45AADA2A@adinet.com.uy
Whole thread Raw
In response to Threaded PosgreSQL server  ("Dann Corbit" <DCorbit@connx.com>)
Responses Re: Threaded PosgreSQL server  ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Dann Corbit wrote:
> 
> Are there any plans to merge the sources from the experimental threaded
> server and the forked server so that a compile switch could choose the
> model?

Just a question, in order to elighten my thought. Does the current experimental
threaded server disable multi-process model? Or does it *add* the functionality
as a compile switch? (This would be the other way round as the one you pointed
out.)

I think it is important as to evaluate resistance to go multithreading.

If they disabled the original method, I agree with Tom. If they *merged* both
flawlessly, I would try to consider it for the current tree.

Any comments?

Regards,
Haroldo.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL v7.2 Final Release
Next
From: Michael Meskes
Date:
Subject: Re: Management tool support and scalibility