Re: Maximum Performance - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From Luis Amigo
Subject Re: Maximum Performance
Date
Msg-id 3C500209.76DF3D44@atc.unican.es
Whole thread Raw
In response to Maximum Performance  ("Jean Huveneers" <j.huveneers@farcourier.com>)
List pgsql-admin
Manuel Trujillo wrote:

> El jue, 24-01-2002 a las 09:27, Luis Amigo escribió:
> > On my own experience I will tell you that if you're able to force postgres
> > to keep all database in memory it will be very fast, so memory only depends
> > on your
> > database size.
> > Each backend may run on a different processor, so the more processors u
> > have the more backends u can run at once
> > hope it helps
>
> Yes, but... How can I know the exact size of my database? And, if I
> compile the postgresql under four processors, don't work like (or in a)
> SMP, distributing the charge into the four processors??
>
> --
> Manuel Trujillo         manueltrujillo@dorna.es
> Technical Engineer      http://www.motograndprix.com
> Dorna Sports S.L.       +34 93 4702864

Si prefieres hablamos en español.


we're currently working on a 8-processor sgi server with irix by now each
backend run in one processor there is no load balance
the amount of memory u will need is as I know (table size+indexes size) they are
in your base directory, if u can afford it then u will be working on memory
but fsync and walfiles
hope it help


Attachment

pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: "Vilson farias"
Date:
Subject: ERROR: cannot read block
Next
From: DHSC Webmaster
Date:
Subject: Re: Maximum Performance