Re: CallableStatements - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc

From Barry Lind
Subject Re: CallableStatements
Date
Msg-id 3C028C71.2030007@xythos.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: CallableStatements  (Stuart Robinson <stuart@zapata.org>)
Responses Re: CallableStatements
List pgsql-jdbc
Stuart,

All stored procedures in postgres return a result.  You can however
ignore the result.

--Barry


Stuart Robinson wrote:

> But what do you do if you want to call a stored procedure and NOT get a
> result?
>
> On Mon, 26 Nov 2001, Barry Lind wrote:
>
>
>>As Dave has said, since stored procedures in Postgres can only return a
>>single value, there is little to be gained from CallableStatements that
>>you can't already do with regular Statements or PreparedStatements.
>>
>>The way to call stored procedures in postgres is via a select statement.
>>  Thus to call procedure foo(), you would issue the query 'select
>>foo()'.  Since this is a standard select statement, you can use either a
>>regular Statement or PreparedStatement to get the result of this stored
>>procedure.
>>
>>Having said that, if you wanted to contribute a CallableStatement
>>implementation for postgres we would be glad to accept it.  Remember
>>that this is an open source project, features get added by people who
>>want or need them.  If you need CallableStatements implement them an
>>submit a patch.
>>
>>thanks,
>>--Barry
>>
>>
>>
>>Dave Cramer wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Well, given that postgres doesn't support the notion of returning a
>>>result set from a stored procedure; I'm not sure what benefit this would
>>>be.
>>>
>>>Regards,
>>>
>>>Dave
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: pgsql-jdbc-owner@postgresql.org
>>>[mailto:pgsql-jdbc-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of
>>>email@gregorybittar.com
>>>Sent: Friday, November 23, 2001 6:47 PM
>>>To: pgsql-jdbc@postgresql.org
>>>Subject: [JDBC] CallableStatements
>>>
>>>
>>>CallableStatements weren't in Postgres as of the last time I checked,
>>>version 7.1.
>>>
>>>The JDBC specification has lots of goodies in it, such as examining a
>>>server's metadata and sending cursors backwards and forwards over result
>>>sets.  However, from the perspective of a Java programmer,
>>>CallableStatements are essential tools for communicating with a database
>>>server.
>>>
>>>Without the benefit of CallableStatements, all efforts at efficiency are
>>>wasted.  The hallmark of any robust system is distributed processing,
>>>which requires invoking stored procedures on foreign machines.  Doing so
>>>through CallableStatements would
>>>(a) accomplish work and (b) retrieve a result code in one logical
>>>network transmission.  Without CallableStatements, retrieving the result
>>>code not only requires more programming infrastructure, but also taxes
>>>the application at runtime as the Java application tries to discover
>>>what the result of the stored procedure was. This method requires an
>>>additional deletion to purge the logged result code record, lest the log
>>>grow, slowing searches. Therefore, we are looking at considerably more
>>>processing done, 2 or 3 transmissions, where 1 should suffice.
>>>
>>>Consequently, I would hope that CallableStatements are recognized as a
>>>very important part of the JDBC puzzle.
>>>
>>>
>>>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>>>TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
>>>    (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>>>TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
>>>subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
>>>message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>>TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>>
>>http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
>>
>>
>



pgsql-jdbc by date:

Previous
From: "Dave Cramer"
Date:
Subject: Re: CallableStatements
Next
From: Barry Lind
Date:
Subject: Re: JDBC bug?