Re: bad style for SECURITY DEFINER - Mailing list pgsql-www

From Daniel Gustafsson
Subject Re: bad style for SECURITY DEFINER
Date
Msg-id 3BBA1EE5-BDC7-44D5-9062-2E1CFDEB1DFC@yesql.se
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: bad style for SECURITY DEFINER  ("Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org>)
Responses Re: bad style for SECURITY DEFINER
List pgsql-www
> On 13 Dec 2021, at 23:14, Jonathan S. Katz <jkatz@postgresql.org> wrote:
>
> On 12/13/21 4:43 PM, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>
>> The margin issue looks right but I think the font-size should match the rest of
>> the title.
>
> Please see attached and below for revision.

I think this looks much better, and it matches how the PDF's are rendered.

> I'm not thrilled about the !important override that's needed to deal with another !important, but I don't want to try
tounweave the !important nest given the lack of overall cases of a code block nested within h2 title tags. 

Agreed on both counts.

--
Daniel Gustafsson        https://vmware.com/




pgsql-www by date:

Previous
From: "Jonathan S. Katz"
Date:
Subject: Re: bad style for SECURITY DEFINER
Next
From: "Jonathan S. Katz"
Date:
Subject: Re: bad style for SECURITY DEFINER