Re: factorial doc bug? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Lockhart
Subject Re: factorial doc bug?
Date
Msg-id 3B9EBCCB.EB940934@fourpalms.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to factorial doc bug?  (Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp>)
Responses Re: factorial doc bug?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
> Are you saying we should remove the whole chapter below from the docs?

Actually, it may be simply that we (now) implement factorial operators
for int8, int4, and int2. Not sure what previous releases implemented,
but perhaps it is just an issue of knowing which one should be used for
the operation. If before we only had, say, int4, then the coersion code
could easily assume that it was the correct coersion.
                     - Thomas


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tatsuo Ishii
Date:
Subject: Re: factorial doc bug?
Next
From: Thomas Lockhart
Date:
Subject: Re: factorial doc bug?