Re: factorial doc bug? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tatsuo Ishii
Subject Re: factorial doc bug?
Date
Msg-id 20010912103858F.t-ishii@sra.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: factorial doc bug?  (Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@fourpalms.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
> > Are you saying we should remove the whole chapter below from the docs?
> 
> Hmm. I wrote that :/
> 
> I vaguely recall some discussion of this topic (a few months ago?). I'm
> not certain that the current behavior was an intended result of changes
> in the "automatic coersion" algorithms, but I think it was. Tom Lane is
> probably the person who made those changes, and we should have him in
> the discussion on whether the current behavior is appropriate. 
> 
> Keep in mind that he is a mathematician, and I'll guess that he won't
> have much patience with folks who expect a result for a factorial of a
> fractional number ;) But there may have been another case which made it
> clearer that the old behavior was a bad road to take. We can look at the
> archives, right?

Ok, let's wait for him coming back...
--
Tatsuo Ishii


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tatsuo Ishii
Date:
Subject: Re: syslog by default?
Next
From: Thomas Lockhart
Date:
Subject: Re: factorial doc bug?